Age Newest 57 Months 35 Months Much more recent. News, opinions, and recommendations on the latest in gaming gear. There are two things we need to consider with this card. The benchmarks sequence via: actually consists of three different test areas. I also had people who were typing apostrophes into the address bar - sigh. The next offense is a ban from the board.
Overall though the experience was very similar in almost every title tested. The 3gb version is also less powerful than the 6gb 1060, but thats only by 5-10% and doenst really play a big role, the vram problems if u want to max out and high textures is way more important and thats why in some games both versions are almost equal in fps and in other games theres a big difference in perfomance. The base and boost clocks also remain unchanged. Damn for some reason I was under the impression that the 1060 was comparable in performance to the 980. What makes the 60s bigger than the 50s is the partial gaming character. Im picking a graphics card and the 1060 3gb has just been released and its cheaper than the 970.
Note that I mentioned the best value. Let's see those blue bar graphs now. I was originally going to go with the 1060 since it's newer technology and has almost the same performance but the 3gb of Vram has me second guessing if it will be enough going into the future. If that one is not much more expensive i would recommend that one. It made sense to just leave it as 'Gamers. In an ideal scenario I would just pick up an rx 580 but since the mining craze has eliminated that option for the time being it's green team only it seems.
The only real difference is power, the 970 is a Maxwell gpu and really requires 500-550w psu, the 1060 is Pascal and needs only 400-450w. The rest of the specs, however, remain the same. The 1060-3 is still a 1060, and in games with lower than 3Gb actual needs, performs exactly the same as a 1060-6. For what is a similar level of performance the R9 290 drove up system power consumption by 30%. Steve started GamersNexus back when it was just a cool name, and now it's grown into an expansive website with an overwhelming amount of features. Loses in titles such as Wreckfest and Rainbow Six Siege were also reduced.
Technically speaking, not much really. The cost was much lower at the time of writing. Even though the 980 has only one extra gigabyte I've seen benchmarks where the 1060 completely chokes in some games due to its limited memory, and I figured it will only be more likely as newer games come out. On average the 970 was 14% slower. Any person doing so will have their post removed and be warned once. Unsurprisingly Nvidia are discontinuing the 780 Ti as it's now largely redundant.
At least, not with this current 1060 setup, and not in a way that makes sense. Chipsets with a higher number of transistors, semiconductor components of electronic devices offer more computational power. When we factor that into the equation, the full-fat 1060 only has a 2 per cent advantage. However its correct that in his case he should definately go with the 6gb 1060 over the 970. It's only in high vram requirement games where the 1060-6 gains a bonus. That means the charts will not have the dozen other cards we've tested on them, for sake of ease and a focused test. Or if u can just live with not maxing out textures all day.
Foreign media Digital Foundry has tested and provides a fair comparison with the. Force Splatted Flocking Swarm 124 fps 159 fps Faster complex splatting. But thats not enough to physically slow fps, the card works the way it does. Also, there will be scenerios where the shaders count differential makes no real impact whatsoever. If there is nothing that meets your needs, feel free to make a new post. The Evga sc 3gb is a good card tho, and mostly much better than the 970 and cheaper at the same time.
They are guilty of prioritizing newer architectures while optimizations for older generations tend to come later, if at all for the really old models. Of the 27 games we'll be testing, just half a dozen of them were featured in last year's battle. Small semiconductors provide better performance and reduced power consumption. First, to what extent does that reduction in shader count impact performance compared to the top tier 1060? The 3gb version was at first targeted for the asian, more mmo based market and is totally fine if u want the nearly 980 performance with high fps, without needing that vram, for example wow, overwatch and esports, moba + older titles in general. The 970 has a full 4Gb of useful vram. The GeForce pulled ahead in our test when looking at the average frame rate, however the 1% low result was identical with both managing 40 fps, so overall the experience was much the same. We're all here to help each other, so be nice.