All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. Original articles are always better than a reddit textpost. Visit for dank shitposts and memes. On paper its really not a fair fight, but its good information if you enjoy playing these games. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus motherboard compatibility , additional power connectors power supply compatibility. Small semiconductors provide better performance and reduced power consumption. Test system: Intel 3570K 4.
Especially for a card thats two generations old, numerically speaking. As long as the minimum framerate stays above the monitors refreshrate and locked on Vsync there is no stuttering. Any other tech support posts will be removed at moderator discretion. I am very impressed with its performance. A system that doesn't has the smallest amout of lowest possible speed memory needed for todays gaming. Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping Stones 279 fps Much better peak texture detail. BioShock Infinite For this benchmark I used the in-game benchmark.
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. The 660ti is not a high end card like the 7950 but the 660ti can act like a high end card in some nvidia optimized games so I have seen. Comparing reference clocks we are seeing a 32% increase in performance with the 7950. A small form factor allows more transistors to fit on a chip, therefore increasing its performance. Tomb Raider I used the in-game benchmark with Extreme settings. There's no need for petty insults on this sub.
Rule 7: Shitposts, memes, and plain box pictures are not allowed as linkposts you can still include them within normal posts or comments. Rule 8: The moderators of reserve the right to allow posts or comments that could technically break any of the rules, when a situation has arisen where the post is especially funny, educational, or useful to the users of the subreddit. Age Newest 25 Months Much more recent. Test system: Intel 3570K 4. Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings. Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping Stones 279 fps Hugely better peak texture detail. Bioshock Infinite was another matter though.
The Polaris 20 graphics processor is an average sized chip with a die area of 232 mm² and 5,700 million transistors. Expect this combination to draw up to 350 Watt though the average power consumption should be slightly lower. See the standard version for more information about it. Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute. Quotes are fine, but pasting the entire article in a textpost is not. Our current testing platform is a recent install of Windows 10 64-bit Home Edition, and we are using an i7-8700K which turbos all 6 cores to 4.
Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For the most part, these areas weren't that common, but being close to them would drop frame rates significantly. Chipsets with a higher number of transistors, semiconductor components of electronic devices offer more computational power. A couple members have requested the comparison, so here you go. The 500 series is built with second generation refined Polaris architecture and is a minor upgrade over the 400 series which was released just 10 months ago. Parallax occlusion mapping Stones 241 fps Hugely better texture detail. Min framerate is all that really matter as it is what makes the game smooth.
Rule 2: No referral links, including Amazon! Please remember that behind every poster is a human. Well I just think the numbers here are not telling of the actual performance delta between the two video cards. Moving to 1440p screen resolution and the graphics card may need to be adjusted down to medium in order to maintain 50-60+ fps. Force Splatted Flocking Swarm 123 fps Much faster complex splatting. Copypasta articles sourced from other websites are not allowed. Tomb Raider I used the in-game benchmark with Ultimate settings. If the post lacks a summary comment, it will be removed.
Product links are fine, affiliate or referral links that benefit you are not. This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. High dynamic range lighting Teapot 166 fps Hugely better reflection handling. Parallax occlusion mapping Stones 241 fps Much better texture detail. We have added minimum frame rates in addition to averages, and are now testing 38 games with a strong emphasis on the very latest games. Stock for stock the 7950 pulls ahead by 35%.
The games tested, settings, and hardware are identical except for the cards being compared. See the settings screenshots below. They will perform basically the same unless the memory difference comes into account. Rules Rule 1: Tech support questions are only allowed in and must instead be posted at or. Use of slurs of any kind, racial, homophobic, or whatever, in any context will result in a ban.